|
От
|
Maxim
|
|
К
|
Nikolaus
|
|
Дата
|
28.09.2009 12:59:54
|
|
Рубрики
|
WWII;
|
|
Re: LW Данные...
>Интересные данные с 12oclockhigh
>Обратите внимание на особенности немецкого подсчета, при котором один самолет мог быть учтен до 5 раз с разной степенью повреждений.
>The last report date for which we have exact numbers in the unit strength reports are January 10th 1945 - at this date the numbers were:
>Aircraft :
>Total losses (aircraft damaged reported as more than 50%) in frontline units (numbers in brackets indicating school, training and other aircraft allocated to a frontline unit):
>In combat: 40613 (1774)
>Non-combat: 10457 (1043)
>Damaged (aircraft damaged reported as less than 50%) in frontline units (numbers in brackets indicating school, training and other aircraft allocated to a frontline unit):
>In combat: 20492 (820)
>Non-combat: 15171 (1614)
>Total losses (aircraft damaged reported as more than 50%) in schools and other non-frontline units (numbers in brackets indicating aircraft of frontline standard - thus aircraft of a relevant type and configuration for frontline combat use but utilized by a non-frontline unit):
>Both in combat and others (most will be non-combat of course): 12442 (5059)
>Damaged (aircraft damaged reported as less than 50%) in schools and other non-frontline units (numbers in brackets indicating aircraft of frontline standard - thus aircraft of a relevant type and configuration for frontline combat use but utilized by a non-frontline unit):
>Both in combat and others (most will be non-combat of course): 9931 (5537)
>So - summing up the frontline units had reported by this date about 61000 combat related losses and 25600 non-combat losses of all types.
>Please remember that it does not implicate that they 'lost' 86600 aircraft - we have examples of the same aircraft being reported at least 5 times - with losses ranging from 10% damage due to a landing accidents - up to a final 100% loss in a training unit several years later.
То есть получается, что машина на фронте повреждалась (учитывалась в качесте потери), потом ремонтировалась на месте и сноава повреждалась (учитылась как потеря, потом направлялась в Германию на ремонт, ремонтировалась, но на фронт не отправляалсь, а отправлялась в школу и
там полностью разбивалась и учитывалась как еще одна потеря?
Но тогда с такой немецкой бухгалтерией мы концов никогда не найдем.